The BBC (2016), in a 3-round study of agility, strength and intelligence, favored the tiger in the case of intelligence, according to the time spent for a particular challenge.
>>365 まーたソースもなしに妄想してるよライオンガイジ ライオン>トラの時点で極端な意見だよ法螺吹き野郎 0370名無虫さん2019/08/17(土) 03:10:24.94ID:???>>364 何回嘘けば気がすむのこいつ Favoring the tiger Alex Kerr, animal trainer who has worked with both lions and tigers, stated in his book that tigers will nearly always win in a fight with a lion and will prove the stronger fighter.[118] John Varty, owner of the Londolozi Reserve in South Africa, said, "People always ask me which one is bigger? If a tiger and a lion had a fight, which one would win? Well, I've seen tigers crunch up a full-grown leopard tortoise like it was nothing. And lions try, but they just don't get it right. If there's a fight, the tiger will win, every time."[119] The animal rescue organisation Big Cat Rescue of Tampa, Florida answered, "While it would depend on the size, age, and aggressiveness of the specific animals involved, generally tigers have a significant advantage."[120] 0371名無虫さん2019/08/17(土) 03:12:23.12ID:???>>364 シベリアトラのスレでトラにマウント取ろうとするくらいだから相当頭おかしいなコイツ
The conservation charity Save China's Tigers stated "Recent research indicates that the tiger is indeed stronger than the lion in terms of physical strength. Lions hunt in prides, so it would be in a group and the tiger as a solitary creature so it would be on its own. A tiger is generally physically larger than a lion. Most experts would favor a Siberian and Bengal tiger over an African lion."[121] John Smith Clarke, a British lion tamer, said, in a lecture on the fight between a tiger and a lion given to the Glasgow Zoological Society, while showing the actual fight on the screen, "in 100 cases out of 100, the tiger would always beat the lion. It was far more agile, it was not so clumsy in its movements, it was equally strong, it was equally armed, but it fought in a different way. The tiger very often fought rolling on its back and held the lion in its grip until it defeated him."[122] National Geographic Channel's documentary The Last Lions of Asia mentioned that a Bengal tiger had a weight advantage of 50 kilograms (110 lb) over an Asiatic lion, and could kill a lone lion in a fight.[32] 0372名無虫さん2019/08/17(土) 03:13:58.72ID:??? avoring the lion Clyde Beatty, the animal trainer and performer who owned several tigers, lions, hyenas, and other exotic animals, believed that in nine out of ten times, "a full-grown lion would whip a full-grown tiger". He mentioned that since he first began mixing the animals, 25 of his tigers (two of them being Siberian tigers, the rest of them being Bengal tigers) were killed in the circus arena, but there was not a single lion casualty.[62] Though in 1933, Beatty said that 16 tigers were killed because lions fought in gangs, whereas tigers fought alone,[123] thus that he had lost many tigers through the gangings of lions.[124] Renowned naturalist and conservationist of India, Kailash Sankhala wrote in his book Tiger that the tiger would be unable to get close to lion's vital joints because of his thick mane, and that the tiger would be vulnerable to the lion. He mentioned that once an Indian prince organized a fight in which the lion killed the tiger, and opined that "a tiger is no match for even single lion of equal strength".[56] Neutral Carl Hagenbeck, a trainer from Hamburg, said that the lion and tiger were alike in "good temper and reliability". He cited the example of a lion being trained for a month to do tricks, and of a tiger taking five weeks to do so.[125] 0373名無虫さん2019/08/17(土) 03:21:07.02ID:???>>362 ライオンが勝るのは髭の防御力のみ 腕力や他の要素は全てトラが上 防御力つったって、雄ライオンは雌ライオンに殺されるレベルだけどw
The BBC (2016), in a 3-round study of agility, strength and intelligence, favored the tiger in the case of intelligence, according to the time spent for a particular challenge.
"lion vs tiger:". BBC Earth Unplugged. Aug 10, 2016.