>>157
おまえ(^^
but other people argue it's not ok, because we would need to define a measure on sequences,

Pruss(^^
if i is chosen uniformly independently of that strategy (where the "independently" here isn't in the probabilistic sense), we win with probability at least (n−1)/n. That's right.

Prussは間違いを認めた。未だに認められないのはおまえ一人(^^;