*☆★ネトウヨ・メンヘラ隔離スレ★☆*
0066名無しさん
垢版 |
2018/04/22(日) 19:26:33.26ID:iQPApCIr0
常に朝鮮を頭の片隅に
負けた時は引っ張り出してきて朝鮮を叩く
そうすれば自我の薄いプライドが保てます
髪は減るだけですけどね
0069名無しさん
垢版 |
2018/05/27(日) 12:27:44.29ID:wpmRyjNM0
https://www.worklawyers.com/job-references-hiring-california/

And, if the information was given without being requested by the potential employer,
it is strong evidence that the statement is false or made with the intent to prevent the employee from being hired. If that is the case,
the former employer may have broken the law by volunteering the information.


Malicious Statements
If a statement is made by a former employer with malice, the common-interest privilege protecting the employer’s reference does not arise.
The California Supreme Court has defined malice in this context as a state of mind arising from hatred or ill will, which evidences a willingness to injure another person.
0070名無しさん
垢版 |
2018/05/27(日) 12:28:05.55ID:wpmRyjNM0
Unsolicited Communications
Imagine the following situation: John used to be employed by ABC Inc.
His supervisor, Bob, disliked John and treated him poorly.
John eventually left ABC Inc. to find another job. After he left, Bob called all of the local businesses to tell them about how terrible an employee John was.
Does Bob still have the common-interest privilege protecting a former employer’s reference?

No. The privilege only kicks in if the former employer is requested by the prospective employer to give the information.
An employer that takes their own initiative to communicate with a prospective employer,
without having first been requested by the prospective employer to do so, does not receive the protections provided by the privilege.

Courts have also noted that the common-interest privilege may be lost
if the former employer excessively communicates or includes statements that are irrelevant to the matters being discussed.
Employers that want to ensure their statements remain privileged, should restrict their statements to those concerning matters being discussed.

So, in Bob’s case, because he preemptively contacted prospective employers without being requested to do so,
his statements cannot be protected under the privilege protecting a former employer’s reference.
0071名無しさん
垢版 |
2018/05/27(日) 12:29:13.62ID:wpmRyjNM0
False Statements
Knowingly false statements are generally not protected by the common-interest privilege. In fact,
a former employer who misrepresents facts and prevents (or attempts to prevent) the former employee from obtaining employment can be found """guilty of a crime!"""

The employer must have credible evidence for the assertions it makes about former employees.
Courts have held that an employer cannot report mere rumors or workplace gossip in a reference to prospective employers.

So, even if a former employer believes something is true, they cannot report it to a prospective employer
unless they have reasonable grounds for believing in the truth of the statements they make.
Those reasonable grounds must be evidence-based, rather than mere speculation.
0072名無しさん
垢版 |
2018/06/03(日) 19:34:17.37ID:NozC+GJDH
ウンコ
0074名無しさん
垢版 |
2018/06/27(水) 21:56:23.44ID:nlaC4Zhv0
>>1   
ーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーー
  
【中国人が多い国・2017】

1. インドネシア・・・・767万チャン
2. タイ・・・・・・・・706万チャン
3. マレーシア・・・・・639万チャン
4. アメリカ・・・・・・346万チャン
5. シンガポール・・・・279万チャン
6. カナダ・・・・・・・137万チャン
7. ペルー・・・・・・・130万チャン
8. ベトナム・・・・・・126万チャン
9. フィリピン・・・・・115万チャン
10. ミャンマー・・・・・110万チャン

★★ 日本省 ・・・・・・73万890チャン

ーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーー

【韓国人が多い国・2017】

1. 中国・・・・・・・(254万8030チョン)
2. アメリカ・・・・・(249万2252チョン)
3. 日本・・・・・・・(81万8626チョン)★★★
4. カナダ・・・・・・(24万942チョン)
5. ウズベキスタン・・(18万1077チョン)
6. オーストラリア・・(18万44チョン)
7. ロシア・・・・・・(16万9680チョン)

ーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーー
   
【韓国】海外に暮らす韓国出身者 743万人に増加=日本には82万人
http://asahi.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/newsplus/1509108029/


                
0075名無しさん
垢版 |
2018/06/28(木) 09:50:16.89ID:n9T0Kw23d
【サッカー/W杯】大会最大の大波乱!前回王者・FIFAランク1位のドイツ、まさかの1次L敗退!!敗退が決まった韓国にロスタイムで2ゴール献上、歴史的敗戦 [KOR 2-0 GER]…グループF最終戦★19
http:// hayabusa9.2ch.net/test/read.cgi/mnewsplus/1530145659/
0076名無しさん
垢版 |
2018/08/28(火) 20:45:03.13ID:GGsYh5u90
>>69
このケース、ジョンさんは当事者と言えど犯罪だそうですよ
0077名無しさん
垢版 |
2018/08/28(火) 20:47:05.21ID:e5mN8S5i0
内容に悪意性が高い
0078名無しさん
垢版 |
2018/09/06(木) 00:02:18.20ID:Fg8zuENW0
Opinion と Statementの違い分かりますか
0079名無しさん(アメリカ合衆国)
垢版 |
2018/09/07(金) 15:56:53.89ID:DqxpesQY0
You can put your opinion in your statement.
0080名無しさん
垢版 |
2019/02/01(金) 06:43:55.94ID:/RtwFKwRH
あげときますねw
0082名無しさん
垢版 |
2020/09/06(日) 14:01:56.93ID:fkZLobEq0
https://twitter.com/yamaguchi02013/status/1302242079607648256
Ex-Fund Manager
返信先: @so_____oodaさん, @kuragekuragearuさん
午後10:48 · 2020年9月5日·Twitter Web App

朝鮮人による嫌がらせは尋常ではありません
事実を指摘すると名誉棄損で訴えると脅迫してきたり、個人情報を晒す嫌がらせをしてきます
感情的に任せて行動をして、すぐに被害者面して逃げ回ります

↑↑↑↑↑
自分が自業自得で責められてるのを朝鮮人のせいと決めつけてるネトウヨです。

京大→ハーバードMBAなのに証券ディーラー首で個人投資家でも大損。
逆恨みで無関係な評論家・ラジオ日経・マネックスを延々とdisる40代独身発達。
ファンドマネージャは嘘、ID変更で逃げまくり→https://idtwi.com/1913040180
https://twitter.com/5chan_nel (5ch newer account)
レスを投稿する


ニューススポーツなんでも実況