>>59
追加

http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~motizuki/Rpt2018.pdf
[Rpt2018] Report by Shinichi Mochizuki (with the cooperation of Yuichiro Hoshi)
　on the March 2018 discussions (updated on 2018-09-21)
(抜粋)
From an organizational point of view, the discussions took the
form of “negotations” between two “teams”: one team (HM), consisting of Hoshi
and Mochizuki, played the role of explaining various aspects of IUTch; the other
team (SS), consisting of Scholze and Stix, played the role of challenging various
aspects of the explanations of HM. Most of the sessions were conducted in the
following format: Mochizuki would stand and explain various aspects of IUTch,
often supplementing oral explanations by writing on whiteboards using markers in
various colors; the other participants remained seated, for the most part, but would,
at times, make questions or comments or briefly stand to write on the whiteboards.

§2. Scholze has, for some time, taken a somewhat negative position concerning
IUTch, and his position, and indeed the position of SS, remained negative even
after the March discussions. My own conclusion, and indeed the conclusion of HM,
after engaging in the March discussions, is as follows:

The negative position of SS is a consequence of certain fundamental
misunderstandings (to be explained in more detail in the remainder of
the present report ? cf. §17 for a brief summary) on the part of SS
concerning IUTch, and, in particular, does not imply the existence of
any flaws whatsoever in IUTch.
The essential gist of these misunderstandings ? many of which center around
erroneous attempts to “simplify” IUTeich ? may be summarized very roughly
as follows:

つづく