Taylor Dupuy
‏ @DupuyTaylor
2017年12月17日

So there is a bit of explaining to do. Look at the editorial board:
http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~prims/


HP Huang
‏ @12358thirteen
2017年12月17日

As long as M let another editor handle the paper and choose impartial reviewers, I am fine with that. The biggest question is who are the referees, and what their referee reports look like.

M Flax
📎
📎
📎‏ @m_flax
返信先: @12358thirteenさん、@DupuyTaylorさん

What if the referee says: "I went step-by-step, and see no errors. But yet I don't yet *understand* the proof." Then the editor-in-chief would have a difficult decision, and a conflict might influence it.


Taylor Dupuy
‏ @DupuyTaylor
1月10日
返信先: @m_flaxさん、@12358thirteenさん

oops, I meant to respond to this. I don't think anywhere is going to publish this unless they understand it 👀
Rock54: Caution(BBR-MD5:0be15ced7fbdb9fdb4d0ce1929c1b82f)