0090132人目の素数さん
2018/01/28(日) 09:10:49.44ID:cBsoPmSs @DupuyTaylor
2017年12月17日
So there is a bit of explaining to do. Look at the editorial board:
http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~prims/
HP Huang
@12358thirteen
2017年12月17日
As long as M let another editor handle the paper and choose impartial reviewers, I am fine with that. The biggest question is who are the referees, and what their referee reports look like.
M Flax
📎
📎
📎 @m_flax
返信先: @12358thirteenさん、@DupuyTaylorさん
What if the referee says: "I went step-by-step, and see no errors. But yet I don't yet *understand* the proof." Then the editor-in-chief would have a difficult decision, and a conflict might influence it.
Taylor Dupuy
@DupuyTaylor
1月10日
返信先: @m_flaxさん、@12358thirteenさん
oops, I meant to respond to this. I don't think anywhere is going to publish this unless they understand it 👀
Rock54: Caution(BBR-MD5:0be15ced7fbdb9fdb4d0ce1929c1b82f)