Japan, India Edge Closer By Victoria Tuke the deplomat May 2, 2012
As Japanese workers depart en masse from the cities for Golden Week, and diplomatic attention focuses on Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda’ s visit to Washington D.C., significant progress has been made in Japan’s relations with India.
Relations between Japan and India are often criticized for lacking initiative. However, as commentators and strategists alike increasingly speak of the “Indo-Pacific” rather than the narrower “Asia-Pacific,” Japan and India are putting this broader concept into practice. 0453名無しさん@お腹いっぱい。2012/05/06(日) 09:27:12.62ID:TCoybTYY ●経済面軍事面で深まっていく日本とインド その2 ------------------------------------ 未だに貿易は180億ドルというがっかりなレベルに留まっている。これは日本の 総貿易額の1%に過ぎない。包括的経済パートナーシップ協定(CEPA)が結ばれた 2011年後でもだ。しかしインドへの外国直接投資は日本の投資により4倍になって いる。日本の企業は巨大な潜在力をインドに見ている。12億の人口でその6割が30才 以下なのだ。
Still, trade remains at disappointing levels of $18 billion, just 1 percent of Japan’s total trade, even after the signing of a Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) in 2011. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in India, however, while declining overall, has quadrupled from Japanese sources. Japanese companies see enormous potential in India’s young, aspirational and vast population - of India’s approximately 1.2 billion people, 60 percent are under the age of 30.
Today, over 800 companies are operating in India, focusing on automobiles, white goods and pharmaceuticals. The flagship project - the Delhi-Mumbai Industrial Corridor (DMIC), a 1,400 kilometer long link between the hubs of Mumbai and Delhi - is currently being implemented following Tokyo’s further commitment in late 2011 of more than $4.5 billion over the next five years. 0454名無しさん@お腹いっぱい。2012/05/06(日) 09:28:05.10ID:TCoybTYY ●経済面軍事面で深まっていく日本とインド その3 ------------------------------------ 日本とインドは以前、2007年の米印主導のマラバール共同訓練に参加した。そして6回目となった ゲンバ外務大臣との会合に於いて、インド海軍と海上自衛隊とので今年後半に共同訓練を行うことと なった。
Japan and India have previously participated in the U.S.-India-led Malabar Exercises in 2007 and as a result of the sixth Strategic Dialogue between Foreign Minister Koichiro Gemba and his Indian counterpart, S.M. Krishna, joint exercises between the Indian Navy and Japan’s Maritime Self-Defense Force will take place later this year. ”
In December, during Noda’s trip to India, Japan relaxed its four-decade long arms export ban. Whether India will take advantage of this remains to be seen. Thus far, the U.K. has been the major beneficiary, which some see as consolation for London losing out on the Eurofighter bid to replace Japan’s next-generation fighter jet. 0455名無しさん@お腹いっぱい。2012/05/06(日) 09:29:14.35ID:TCoybTYY ●経済面軍事面で深まっていく日本とインド その4 ------------------------------------ インドは明確には共同開発を呼び掛けていない。しかしインドの軍事専門家は日本の進んだ技術に 興味を示している。2011年インドは世界最大の武器輸入国になった。兵器の近代化を進めた結果だ。 いくつかのレポートによれば、インド海軍は新明和のUS−2飛行艇の評価をしている最中だ。 それは4700kmの行動範囲を持つ。
India hasn’t explicitly called for joint development, but military experts in India have voiced interest in Japan’s advanced technology. In 2011, India was the world’s biggest importer of arms, reflecting a shift towards the modernization of its military hardware. India’s ports in particular require attention, while according to some reports, the Indian Navy is currently evaluating the Shinmaywa US-2 amphibious aircraft, which has a range of 4,700 kilometers.
India remains hesitant over suggestions that ties with Japan come at the expense of others in the region. India’s location means it’s surrounded by often antagonistic neighbors, as well as Russia and China. In April, Krishna traveled to Moscow to meet his Chinese and Russian counterparts as part of the Russia-India-China trilateral partnership that has become increasing less relevant since the establishment of the BRICS meetings. 0456名無しさん@お腹いっぱい。2012/05/06(日) 09:31:01.13ID:TCoybTYY ●経済面軍事面で深まっていく日本とインド 最後 ------------------------------------ しかしじょじょに日本とインドは4月24日のような小規模二国間関係に利益があると考えるように なっている。日本は日印米3カ国会議を東京で開催した。これは2011年12月ワシントンで行った ものの2回目である。
Gradually, however, India and Japan are recognizing the benefit of such “mini-laterals” On April 24, for instance, Japan hosted a Japan-India-U.S. trilateral dialogue in Tokyo, the second such session since the forum was inaugurated in Washington, D.C. in December 2011. The discussions received relatively little attention, but considering China’s opposition to previous attempts to group like-minded nations - such as the failed Quad initiative (with the addition of Australia) in 2007 - Beijing’s muted response was a positive development.
Even on the most politically sensitive subject of nuclear energy, Japan and India are pushing forward with negotiations on Japanese nuclear exports, since they began in June 2010.
Nevertheless, in both capitals, Japan-India relations enjoy cross-party support as well as encouragement from the United States. Although U.S. overtures towards India in recent years have no doubt accelerated Japan’s own efforts, Tokyo and New Delhi are taking the lead in developing one of the most important relationships for both their futures. 0457名無しさん@お腹いっぱい。2012/05/08(火) 01:22:34.21ID:nDRYcarm 【政治】日印 海洋での安全保障協力で合意 http://uni.2ch.net/test/read.cgi/newsplus/1335799750/ 玄葉外務大臣は、インドの首都ニューデリーでクリシュナ外相と「戦略対話」を行い、 両国の間で海洋での安全保障協力について協議する枠組みを設けることで合意しました。
The Sino-Japanese Naval War of 2012 AUGUST 20, 2012 BY JAMES R. HOLMES
Such a fight appeared farfetched before 2010, when Japan's Coast Guard apprehended Chinese fishermen who rammed one of its vessels off the disputed islands, but it appears more likely now. After Japan detained and deported Chinese activists who landed on the disputed islands in mid-August, a hawkish Chinese major general, Luo Yuan, called on China to dispatch 100 boats to defend the Diaoyus. In an op-ed published Aug. 20, the nationalistic Chinese broadsheet Global Times warned, "Japan will pay a price for its actions ... and the result will be far worse than they anticipated." 0491名無しさん@お腹いっぱい。2012/08/25(土) 13:56:31.54ID:lfk3Njbk ●支那海軍は海自に大敗する その2
This is more than mere posturing. In July, China's East Sea Fleet conducted an exercise simulating an amphibious assault on the islands. China's leaders are clearly thinking about the unthinkable. And with protesters taking to the streets to smash Japanese cars and attack sushi restaurants, their people may be behind them. So who would win the unlikely prospect of a clash of titans in the Pacific: China or Japan?
While the Japanese postwar "peace" constitution "forever renounces war as a sovereign right of the nation and the threat or use of force as means of settling international disputes, " the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force (JMSDF) has accumulated several pockets of material excellence, such as undersea warfare, since World War II. And Japanese mariners are renowned for their professionalism. If commanders manage their human, material, and geographic advantages artfully, Tokyo could make a maritime war with China a close-run thing -- and perhaps even prevail. 0492名無しさん@お腹いっぱい。2012/08/25(土) 13:57:00.78ID:lfk3Njbk ●支那海軍は海自に大敗する その3
Past naval wars between the two rivals set the stage for today's island controversy. During the Sino-Japanese War of 1894-1895, a fleet engagement turned Asia's Sinocentric order upside down in an afternoon. The Imperial Japanese Navy, hurriedly cobbled together from imported hulls and components following Japan's Meiji Restoration, smashed China's Beiyang Fleet, a force widely considered superior in material terms. The September 1894 Battle of the Yalu River was won by the navy with superior seamanship, gunnery, and morale. While Japan is no longer a rising power, the JMSDF has preserved a culture of human excellence. 0493名無しさん@お腹いっぱい。2012/08/25(土) 13:57:19.87ID:lfk3Njbk ●支那海軍は海自に大敗する その4
In raw numerical terms, there is no contest. Japan's navy boasts 48 "major surface combatants," ships designed to attack enemy main fleets while taking a pounding themselves. For the JMSDF these include "helicopter destroyers," or light aircraft carriers; guided-missile destroyers equipped with the state-of-the-art Aegis combat system, a combination radar, computer, and fire-control system found in frontline U.S. Navy warships; and an assortment of lesser destroyers, frigates, and corvettes. A squadron of 16 diesel-electric submarines augments the surface fleet. Juxtapose this against the PLA Navy's 73 major surface combatants, 84 missile-firing patrol craft, and 63 submarines, and the bidding appears grim for Japan. China's navy is far superior in sheer weight of steel. 0494名無しさん@お腹いっぱい。2012/08/25(土) 13:57:47.62ID:lfk3Njbk ●支那海軍は海自に大敗する その5
But raw numbers can be misleading, for three main reasons. First, as strategist Edward Luttwak has observed, weapons are like "black boxes" until actually used in combat: no one knows for sure whether they will perform as advertised. Battle, not technical specifications, is the true arbiter of military technology's value. Accurately forecasting how ships, planes, and missiles will perform amid the stresses and chaos of combat thus verges on impossible. This is especially true, adds Luttwak, when conflict pits an open society against a closed one. Open societies have a habit of debating their military failings in public, whereas closed societies tend to keep their deficiencies out of view. Luttwak was referring to the U.S.-Soviet naval competition, but it applies to Sino-Japanese competition as well. The Soviet Navy appeared imposing on paper. But Soviet warships on the high seas during The PLA Navy could be hiding something as well. The quality of the JMSDF's platforms, and its human capabilities, could partially or wholly offset the PLA's advantage of numbers. 0495名無しさん@お腹いっぱい。2012/08/25(土) 13:58:05.14ID:lfk3Njbk ●支那海軍は海自に大敗する その6
Second, there's the human variable in warfare. In his classic account, The Naval War of 1812, Theodore Roosevelt explained the U.S. Navy's success in single-ship duels against Britain's Royal Navy as a product of quality ship design and construction and superior fighting prowess: in other words, of material and human factors. The latter is measured in seamanship, gunnery, and the myriad of traits that set one navy apart from others. Mariners hone these traits not by sitting in port and polishing their equipment but by going to sea. JMSDF flotillas ply Asian waters continually, operating solo or with other navies. The PLA Navy is inert by comparison. With the exception of a counter-piracy deployment to the Gulf of Aden that began in 2009, Chinese fleets emerge only for brief cruises or exercises, leaving crews little time to develop an operating rhythm, learn their profession, or build healthy habits. The human edge goes to Japan.
And three, it's misleading to reduce the problem solely to fleets. There will be no purely fleet-on-fleet engagement in Northeast Asia. Geography situated the two Asian titans close to each other: their landmasses, including outlying islands, are unsinkable aircraft carriers and missile firing platforms. 0496名無しさん@お腹いっぱい。2012/08/25(土) 13:58:33.92ID:lfk3Njbk ●支那海軍は海自に大敗する 最後
And finally, Chinese leaders would be forced to consider how far a marine war would set back their sea-power project. China has staked its economic and diplomatic future in large part on a powerful oceangoing navy. In December 2006, President Hu Jintao ordered PLA commanders to construct "a powerful people's navy" that could defend the nation's maritime lifelines -- in particular sea lanes that connect Indian Ocean energy exporters with users in China -- "at any time." That takes lots of ships. If it lost much of the fleet in a Sino-Japanese clash -- even in a winning effort -- Beijing could see its momentum toward world-power status reversed in an afternoon.
Here's hoping China's political and military leaders understand all this. If so, the Great Sino-Japanese Naval War of 2012 won't be happening outside these pages. 0497名無しさん@お腹いっぱい。2012/08/25(土) 20:51:00.22ID:+hgxKqLF 対中政策だけで、インドと組めると思うの? インドとパキスタンは、人種としては同じアーリア人だ。近親憎悪こそが印パ対立の根源であり インドとの同盟は、日本をパキスタンとの対立に巻き込むことになる。